VPN Servers - UJVPN | 100+ Countries / 180+ Routes

Regional Directory

Browse International Routes by Region

Use the table to compare exit regions and route types; temporary speed-test values are not shown. Node status changes with network conditions, so switch routes based on the target service region and current connection results.

Country or Region	City	Route Type	Streaming
Asia-Pacific
Hong Kong, China	Hong Kong	IEPL Dedicated Line	Supported
Japan	Tokyo	IEPL Dedicated Line	Supported
Singapore	Singapore	IEPL Dedicated Line	Supported
South Korea	Seoul	Relay	Supported
Taiwan, China	Taipei	Relay	Supported
Malaysia	Kuala Lumpur	Direct	General Route
Thailand	Bangkok	Direct	General Route
Philippines	Manila	Direct	General Route
Indonesia	Jakarta	Direct	General Route
Vietnam	Ho Chi Minh City	Direct	General Route
North America
United States	Los Angeles	IEPL Dedicated Line	Supported
United States	San Jose	Relay	Supported
United States	New York	Direct	Supported
Canada	Toronto	Direct	Supported
Mexico	Mexico City	Direct	General Route
Europe
United Kingdom	London	Relay	Supported
Germany	Frankfurt	Relay	Supported
France	Paris	Direct	Supported
Netherlands	Amsterdam	Direct	Supported
Switzerland	Zurich	Direct	General Route
Spain	Madrid	Direct	Supported
Italy	Milan	Direct	General Route
Other Regions
Australia	Sydney	Relay	Supported
New Zealand	Auckland	Direct	Supported
United Arab Emirates	Dubai	Direct	General Route
India	Mumbai	Direct	General Route
Brazil	São Paulo	Direct	Supported
South Africa	Johannesburg	Direct	General Route

The directory shows examples from major regions. Coverage includes 100+ countries and 180+ routes; after signing in, view currently available routes in the client.

Route Structure

How to Choose Between Three Route Types

Route names describe how the cross-border segment is organized, not a fixed speed ranking. Understanding the path, routing method, and cost differences is more useful for troubleshooting than looking at the name alone.

IEPL

IEPL Dedicated Line

An IEPL dedicated line carries the critical cross-border segment over a controlled, enterprise-grade link. The path between entry and exit is more defined, with fewer unpredictable routes across the public network. It suits sustained transfers, long-lived connections, video playback, and interactive work that benefits from consistent connectivity. For remote meetings, cloud documents, repository sync, and streaming responses, continuity usually matters more than a brief peak speed; the main value of a dedicated line is path control.

These routes require dedicated link and routing resources, so operating costs are typically higher than ordinary direct connections. There is no need to send every request through a dedicated line: when the target service is nearby and the direct path is healthy, direct access may work just as well. A practical approach is to reserve dedicated routes for continuity-sensitive sessions and test them first when accessing distant regions or during noticeable evening instability.

Best for: Long-form streaming · AI streaming output · Remote collaboration · Large-file sync

RELAY

Relay Route

A relay route first sends the connection to a more stable entry point, then forwards it through an intermediate node to the target region. Its purpose is not simply to add a hop, but to avoid a poor direct path and use a better regional entry for routing. When accessing distant regions, a relay can reduce fluctuations caused by unpredictable detours and let the same exit region serve networks from more locations.

Relay performance depends on the entry-and-exit combination. For a North American target, test a relay intended for North America first; for Europe, choose a Europe-facing route rather than keeping one route fixed because it once performed well. A relay also adds a routing segment, so extra forwarding may not be preferable when the local network already has a good direct path. Think of it as a path-optimization tool, not a rank that is automatically better than other types.

Best for: Long-distance access · Regional service switching · Cross-network connections · Backup paths

DIRECT

Direct Route

A direct route connects the current network straight to an exit in the target region, with fewer routing layers and a clearer structure. It also makes it easier to identify whether an issue lies with the local network, the cross-border segment, or the target service. For nearby regions, ordinary web access, email, and light development work, direct access is usually a sensible first choice. If the target service is already in a neighboring region, adding a relay may not improve the result.

Direct routes rely more heavily on public routing between the source network and the exit data center. Path changes, congestion, or interconnection shifts can alter performance at certain times. This does not mean the exit node itself has failed. During troubleshooting, first try another route type in the same region, then test a nearby region. Direct routes have a relatively simple resource structure, making them suitable for broad coverage and everyday access, as well as providing a useful baseline for comparison.

Best for: Everyday browsing · Email communication · Light development · Same-region access

Use-Case Matching

Choose a Route by Use Case

First identify the target service region, then consider how much continuity, regional targeting, and interaction stability the task requires. Route type is only one filter; the final choice should be based on actual connection results on the current network.

Everyday Browsing

For websites, search, email, and light file access, start with a nearby direct or relay entry point. If the goal is simply to open international websites, there is no need to lock onto a distant popular region. Test nearby directions such as Hong Kong, Japan, or Singapore first; if page loading is inconsistent, switch to a relay or IEPL dedicated line in the same region. Rule-based split routing can also keep local requests on their normal path and reduce unrelated traffic over international routes.

Nearby direct → Same-region relay

Streaming

Streaming exit selection is determined first by the content licensing region. Choose a Japan exit for Japan-region content and a United States exit for a US library rather than choosing only by physical distance. After playback starts, check whether quality remains stable, seeking resumes buffering, and long sessions avoid interruptions. If the same region offers an IEPL dedicated line or relay, compare them in sequence when direct access is unstable. Account region and provider content policies also affect the result; changing the exit alone cannot replace account-side requirements.

Target region → Streaming route

AI Tools

AI web apps, IDE plugins, and API calls often involve authentication, long-lived connections, and streaming responses. Keep the region consistent where possible: use the same exit area for login, everyday use, and development calls to avoid frequent cross-region changes during a session. For continuous generation, file uploads, and long-context tasks, test an IEPL dedicated line or stable relay first; for short queries, a nearby direct route may be enough. If responses stop midway, pin the exit region and reconnect before checking the tool itself.

Fixed region → Stable link

Gaming

Gaming depends on sustained interaction and path stability. The exit should be near the game server region, not necessarily near the player. Confirm the actual game server region, then test a direct route there; if the cross-network path is unstable, switch to a relay or dedicated line. Updates and live matches can use different strategies: updates prioritize sustained downloads, while matches prioritize interaction stability. Network acceleration cannot change the game server’s maintenance status or eliminate jitter caused by a local wireless network.

Server region → Path comparison

Remote Work

For remote meetings, business email, cloud documents, code hosting, and collaboration platforms, prioritize session continuity. If company services are concentrated in one region, using an exit in that region over time can help keep the access environment consistent. Compare an IEPL dedicated line and a relay for video meetings and large-file sync; nearby direct access is often enough for ordinary document editing. When local systems and international services must be accessed together, enable rule-based split routing and check the route before the meeting to avoid changing exits mid-session.

Service region → Session continuity

Troubleshooting Order

What to Check When Switching Routes

Change only one condition at a time so you can tell whether the difference comes from the exit region or the route structure. Randomly switching too often obscures the results and may repeatedly trigger regional checks for a login session.

A

Fix the Target Region First

Choose an exit based on the region of the website, AI tool, game server, or business system. When the region does not match, a healthy connection may still produce unexpected content or service decisions. During troubleshooting, keep the account, client, and target service unchanged; compare only different routes within the same region.

B

Then Compare Route Structure

Within the same target region, compare direct, relay, and IEPL dedicated routes in sequence. A quick webpage load shows basic connectivity only, not long-connection performance. For streaming, complete playback and seeking checks; for AI tools, observe streaming output; for work scenarios, complete a real sync or meeting connection.

C

Keep a Working Backup Path

Local networks and public routes change, so relying on a single saved node makes failover harder. Keep both direct and relay options for frequently used regions, and test them in a set order when the primary route fails. A backup path should serve the same target region; avoid changing the exit location casually during important sessions.

D

Check the Local Environment

If several regions and route types fail at the same time, return to the local network. Check the client subscription status, system time, rule mode, and current network; then reconnect and test a basic webpage. Only when one region is affected should you consider switching that region’s exit. This helps avoid mistaking local wireless issues or target-service status for a node problem.